What is a common criticism of the Design Argument regarding natural events?

The Design Argument suggests that the intricate order and complexity of the universe indicates the existence of a designer, often interpreted as God. A common criticism of this argument is that it fails to adequately explain the presence of natural evil, which refers to suffering and disaster that occur due to natural processes, such as earthquakes or disease. Critics argue that if a benevolent and omnipotent designer created the world, then the existence of such suffering seems contradictory to this idea. This criticism highlights a gap in the argument, suggesting that it overlooks the reality of suffering that exists in nature, which raises questions about the nature and intentions of the supposed designer. By concentrating on the concept of design without addressing the implications of natural evil, the argument may appear less robust, as it does not account for the full scope of human and natural experiences.